Thursday, 19 March 2020

Music Videos


Music Videos

Music videos are used for promotional purposes of a song and artist, it is a digital convergence of music and film, it can be a synergy of two separate audiences that are targeted.

Chantal Goya - Si tu gagnes au flipper - 1966

  • The video differs from modern music videos as it isn't high production compared with modern videos. The generic fluidity found is that music videos have changed over time with technology and becoming more popular over time.


REBBECA - VANITY ANGEL - 1989

  • The video uses elaborate mise-en-scene by using a green screen and creating pattern backgrounds, as well as creating various scenes such as performing in a room and in a room with mirrors. The music video also uses bricolage such as the green screen background and contrasting with the woman with an umbrella and dress from another period, creating different contexts.


Kylie Monogue - Hand On Your Heart - 1989

  • The representation of women in the music video is that it follows the stereotypes of women caring about their looks, the setting and mise-en-scene anchor this by featuring her wearing dresses, with hearts everywhere and she is looking at herself in the mirror.

Pulp - This Is Hardcore - 1998


  • The video uses many scenes, mostly including scenes you would typically see in movies as a symbolic code about pornography through the use of mise-en-scene. This perhaps suggests what the man thought what sex was like based on what he has seen.

Benni Benassi - Satisfaction - 2001


  • This video includes hyper-sexualisation of women, the symbolic codes used are representative of sexualisation of women.

Kyary Pamyu Pamyu - PONPONPON - 2011


  • The producer has contructed the artist as a 'star' rather than human, from the use of costume and the way she performs.

BLACKPINK - 뚜두뚜두 - 2018


  • This video constructs and subverts the representation of women by showing them to be powerful such as one member sitting high up on a chess board, on top of a queen chess piece - mise-en-scene.

Thursday, 5 March 2020

Adbusters - Contextual factors


Adbusters - Contextual factors

Dominant Ideological perspective
  • The ideology of Adbusters is to go against what other magazines do, most magazines include advertisement whereas Adbusters are against using adverts as they believe that in modern media, people consume thousands of adverts everyday. They are anti-establishment and anti-consumerist. This makes the magazine subvert the traditional magazine conventions as it doesn't include pages of advertisements. Adbusters are interactive with its audience and readers as such as a 'culture jammers network' in which people send in their own culture jammed (parody) adverts, in which both communicate with each other, also people send in ideas or photos to be featured in the magazine.
Ideology and how it interacts with the audience

  • The Adbusters Foundation runs the following campaigns called Occupy Wall Street and Buy Nothing Day, the Occupy Wall Street is a campaign against large cooperations, in which the protest took place in Zucotti Park. The Buy Nothing Day campaign is not buying anything during Black Friday but is also to make people do less shopping in general. 
  • The controversies and criticisms of Adbusters is the message they are spreading to not buy from brands but are asking the readers to buy their own brand, such as sustainable shoes that also extends the brand. And also spreads some messages that can be controversial such as politics.

Monday, 2 March 2020

Adbusters - Website


Adbusters - Website


  • Adbusters construct its audiences by creating sections to pages in which the audience can be involved such as, 'Manifesto' in which the audience can communicate to. A 'Culture Shop', 'Subscribe' and 'Donate', the audience can be involved by doing the following things. There is also another link, '#Blackspot Collective', and when the audience scrolls down there is a way to join in the 'Blackspot'. 
  • The website reinforces Adbusters' brand identity of being anti-consumerist as there are no adverts on the website which most magazine websites do include, anti-establishment with the logo of a scribble. 
  • The house-style of the website is black and white, with a 'messy' style and the typography used is a typewriter-style font. However, the magazine doesn't follow as much of a house-style.
  • The website extends the brand by having merchandise found on 'Culture Shop', through '#Blackspot Collective' a link to another website 'http://abillionpeople.org', social media found at the bottom of the page and a video on YouTube also found at the bottom of the page.
  • The magazine uses social media to spread their ideologies to their reader and promote the magazines.
  • The readers can interact through the website and social media by how Adbusters construct their audiences and what position they put their audience, the audience can construct their own ideologies - Gauntlett's theory of identity.
  • The magazine has made their own audience - Curran and Seaton's theory of power.

  • The website represents Adbusters’ anti-consumerist beliefs by the logo used being a scribble, something which anyone can easily draw.
  • Culture jamming and commodity fetishism can be found on the website on the top of the website bar, 'Spoof Ads', and on the page there are different types such as, 'Political/Historical' and 'Corporate'. All the spoof ads includes parodying of consumerism in some way, for example, 'Unswooshing' is a parody take on the 'Swoosh' by Nike with one image including a shoe and written on it 'Nike $250' and 'Sweatshop 83¢', perhaps represneting how much the shoe costs and how much the workers who made it earned - anti-establishment.

Friday, 28 February 2020

Adbusters - Double Page Spread






Adbusters - Double Page Spread

  • There is text with '350 ppm', which means the safe amount of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere.
  • The semiotic codes used is hermenuetic as the reader may wonder what the number means.
  • The anchorage of pollution with the number and also the street behind which produces lots of pollution.
  • Suggestive to the model represents people only caring about themselves and not the environment enough. With fast fashion (consumerism), as the season changes people through out clothes from the old season, and questions the reader on what they are doing.
  • With the contrast of the model and someone appearing homeless by sitting on the side of the road asking for money (action code).
  • The quote of the right hand side links to the image of the homeless person in a way that suggests 'this could be you', as the quote talks about evacuating big cities, there being food shortages and prices increasing e.g, 'collapse of food production', the lexis used is serious.
  • The imagery is black and white creating a sense of no happiness and also seriousness, to represent the message the magazine is spreading.
  • The mode of address, the two people are using direct eye contact creating direct address.
  • The binary opposition of the two extremes, a model and a homeless person.

Tuesday, 25 February 2020

Adbusters Article - 'Save the Planet Kill Yourself'


Adbusters Article - 'Save the Planet Kill Yourself'


  • The issue being represented in the article is how the environment is being affected by the actions of humans for example, the article mentions about the production of plastic, food and drink, gadgets and clothes, 'This plastic comes from petroleum by-products like HGL and may be synthesised from crude oil in other parts of the world', the article tells the audience what is in everyday products in supermarkets and also how it is made, 'all the child labour and poverty labour that went into your clothes you are wearing'. The article uses direct address, to directly speak to the reader about these issues.
  • The representations that are used to present ideologies to position the audience is the idea that the article is directly about them, and narrating their lives, it assumes the audience buys these products in the supermarket and represents them to be in a position of perhaps not knowing or in denial. For example, 'the fact you are so used to these crises and disasters in and around the things you eat, wear and use that you learned long ago', there is also the idea that the audience have realised their actions and that they're wrong and are willing to change, 'Create alternative models of consumption'. The lexis and language used is blunt, the audiences are forced to focus on the article with lack of colour, images and adverts and is nihilistic in creating a sense of powerlessness and helplessness. The dominant ideology of this article is that humans are causing problems for the planet and that they should make sacrifices, ‘Kill Yourself’ to ‘Save the Planet’, and that currently they believe that it is the other way round.
  • The historical, cultural, social, political significance of representation that magazines offer is an ideology which they believe that the audience should believe in. 
  • Gauntlet's theory of identity is the idea that the audience can pick or choose what ideologies suit them and ignore the ideologies which they disagree with, in this case the audience may choose to believe the article or not, however the article points out how the reader may be in denial about the situation. For example, ‘the fact you are so used to these crises and disasters in and around the things you eat, wear and use that you learned long ago’.

Monday, 10 February 2020

Adbusters - Christian Louibouton Advert and Runway Advert


Adbusters - Christian Louibouton Advert


Commodity fetishism- The idea and process of ascribing magic 'phantom-like' qualities to an object, whereby the human labour required to make that object is lost once the object is associated with monetary value for exchange.

  • Christian Louibouton is a designer brand well-known for the red-sole high heels.
  • Commodity fetishism, the iconic shoes have a magic 'phantom-like' quality to it.
  • There is a juxtaposition with the brand and with the imagery of the person's feet using plastic bottles as shoes, this communicates an anti-consumerist ideology and is a culture jam of the company and its adverts.
  • The representations of ethnicity is constructed by Gilroy's post-colonialism theory, the image represents the difference between Western countries and post-colonial countries. The person is wearing shoes made of plastic bottles, the background suggests the person is in a hot and dry climate (scorched ground) suggesting drought/famine. There is a sense of racial hierarchy between post-colonial countries and Western countries. Structuralism - binary oppositions a designer brand and someone wearing bottles as shoes.
  • The audience is positioned in relation to these representations as the preferred reading (Hall's reception theory) as they are the target audience, they know what Adbusters is like and it caters to their interests.
  • The idea of 'otherness' is created in the advert to create a social and economic point about the inequality of power, using stereotypical representation of ethnicity.
  • The tagline, 'red soles are always in season', the brand is iconic for red-sole shoes and 'season' a term associated with fashion however it is 'always in season' from the lexis used, fashion changes each season but this person would probably be wearing bottle shoes, shows further binary oppositions and inequality.
  • Irony is created as the red-sole high heel shoes costs lots of money and usually heels hurt your feet and people are paying for that whereas this person's feet hurt so they made free shoes.
  • The theory of identity by Gauntlett, is the idea the audience can pick 'n' mix what their identity is and whether they have to same ideology as the magazine of being anti-consumerist.
  • Barthes' semiotic codes, the hermenuetic code to the audience making them wonder what the image of the person's feet and the meaning that the magazine is trying to convey.

Adbusters - Runway Advert

  • Levi-Strauss' theory of binary oppositions is found in the two images, one of which is a model on the runway and the other is of people behind a barbed-wire fence. This perhaps represents the exploitation, the people may of made the clothing but the model wearing it will earn more from it. The model is also wearing high-end and what would be seen as nice clothes whereas the people in the above photo are wearing non-designer and 'undesirable' clothing.
  • The stereotypes found is that the model is white and successful whereas the people behind the barbed wire are of colour and in poverty.
  • The mode of the address is direct, without lexis, suggests the target audience and preferred reading (Hall's reception theory) are perhaps middle-class, creating the sense of guilt for exploiting the people to buy clothes.
  • Post-colonialism is seen as the effects after countries were previously colonised, it benefited the Western country and not the colonised country.
  • Culture Jamming, it is usually found in magazines models in adverts but mocks it using another image of people behind barbed wire fence and in suggested poverty.
  • Gauntlett's identity theory, says the the audience pick 'n' mix their ideologies and identities in whether or which they believe in what the message that the magazine is spreading; the message of the magazine is anti-consumerism with left-wing politics.
  • Semiotic codes, the hermeneutic code in the advert is that the audience questions what the meaning of it is, as there are no obvious meanings.
  • Commodity Fetishism is giving objects a magic ‘phantom-like’ quality, in this case perhaps the dress the model is wearing but it is juxtaposed with the image above as something people wouldn’t want to have.

Friday, 7 February 2020

Adbusters - Media Set Product 8


Adbusters


  • This magazine was published in May/June 2016.
  • It is independent/niche/campaigning/‘culture jamming’ magazine.
  • It is usually published 6 times a year by Adbusters Media Foundation from 1989 to present. The price is £10.99 with average circulation of 120000 (Apr 2017).
  • They say they are a ‘Journal of mental environment’ , ‘Based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada’, ‘not for-profit magazine fighting back against the hostile takeover of psychological, physical and cultural environments by commercial forces‘.


Front Cover
  • The masthead is a bold, white, sans-serif font with an overlay of the main image.
  • The only coverline featured is 'post - west' which is centred but also goes across the whole page and doesn't follow the typical conventions of a magazine.
  • The coverline is more clear to see, the story is more important than the magazine and its brand.
  • The main image used is a man in an army/camouflage vest which suggests he is a solider suggesting violence. The man is screaming/shouting, his facial expression communicates animalistic including his baring teeth and furrowed brows, he is angry. The overall body language includes a clenched fist - he is angry and ready to fight, adding to violence and the ideas of war.
  • The main image is a mid-shot, to see the body language clearly but also shows some of the facial expressions. The image looks rolled on and is low quality which doesn't follow the typical conventions of a magazine front cover including high-quality and production-value image. The quality of the image further shows the chaos of a war-zone, the background isn't in focus, it creates an enigma code or suggestion to being anywhere.
  • Disrupting our expectations of a magazine front cover.
  • The coverline, ‘post - west’ suggests interference of Western countries in middle-eastern wars, it suggests it will discuss about the problems of Westernisation and that post-colonialism (Gilroy’s theory) has caused problems, the West believes that it is ‘saving’ these countries after mistakes made of colonisation.
  • Anti-establishment.
  • Not perpetuating dominant ideologies in the West - social and the political message
  • Assumption that the audience/reader will already understand the context.

Wednesday, 5 February 2020

Regulation in the UK


The effectiveness of regulatory framework of magazines (UK)

Theory of Regulation - Livingstone and Hunt
  • This theory is about the rise of power of global media coportations, in which convergent media technologies has placed traditional approaches to media difficult.
  • IPSO regulates the British magazines and newspapers.
  • It has changed since 1964, as beliefs on what's acceptable and what's not has changed, e.g, sexism.
  • There are laws around privacy obscenity (when something is deemed as not acceptable morally) however there is a grey-area in this, particually in regulation.


Conde Nast Traveller Print advert and the Culitvation theory - Gerbner
  • The cultivation theroy is when the media warps and cultivates the audience's perception of reality. The more the audience sees something in particular in media, the more they believe that it is normal.
  • In the Conde Nast Traveller advert, which was feautured in the magazine Glamour, however it was reported as the woman looked 'unhealthily thin'.
    • The ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) questioned whether the advert was 'socially responsible' deemed by watchdogs.
    • The advert was then banned.


Oz Magazine Scandal
  • The Oz magazine was first published in the late 1960's, early 70's. It is also originally Australian but then moved to Britain. 
  • The magazine faced the longest obscenity trials in the UK for featuring a sexually explicit cartoon parody of Rupert the Bear, which was aimed for children.
  • The editors of the magazine were charged, (Richard Neville, Jim Anderson and Felix Dennis) for conspiring school children to having corrupt morals.
  • They were set free for the conspiracy but still jailed for two minor offences, to then eventually to be released from prison.
  • The legal fight for the magazine showed a shift in 1960's British society, questions to authority in whether they controlled what people saw or whether people decided to see it or not.
  • The magazine also faced obscenity trials in Australia, for controversial topics at the time such as, censorship, homosexuality, police brutality and Australia's policies.
Reception theory - Hall
  • Preferred reading.
  • Negotiated reading.
  • Oppositional reading.

Reception Theory - Woman


Woman - Reception theory

  • The preferred reading of the magazine and the dominant hegemonic position is the target audience of Woman, the target audience would be women in the early 1960's.
  • However the oppositional reading would be men, but in modern society majority of people would either be the negotiated reader or oppositional reader because of the changes in society since then and what is deemed as socially acceptable such as changes in regulation.
  • Examples of this would be the Alfred Hitchcock interview, in the 60's people would believe that it is acceptable for his ideas of what women should be, do or look like, whereas in 2020, it would be seen very sexist because of the changes in society and the increase in the feminist movement.
    • From the front cover, there are ideologies of women being stereotypically housewives whereas today that could be seen as not necessarily true.
    • The contents also features ideologies of women's interests, 'Beauty', 'Cooking', 'Fashion', 'Home', 'Knitting'. Majority of women's interests have changed since the 1960's.
    • The adverts in the magazine by Max Factor and Breeze, this represents women having to be beautiful and also objectifies them, readers nowadays may believe that the Breeze advert maybe more socially unacceptable as she is more sexually objectified.
  • The audience's interpretation can be influenced by social, historical and cultural circumstances as women in the 1960's would be the preferred reading of the Woman magazine because society in the early sixties would consider these ideologies and what now would be known as sexist. This would be acceptable, which represents the regulation of conglomerates and the control of ideologies.
  • The different audience interpretations with emphasis on polysemic readings, is found from readers in the 60's and their views and readers in 2020 and their views.

Sunday, 2 February 2020

Industry - IPC


IPC

  • IPC (International Publishing Corporation) was established in 1963 with a merge of George Newnes (1881), Odhams Press (1880) and Fleetway Publications (1890) with Mirror Group.
  • The Field (1853) joined the IPC in 1994 followed by Harmsworth Magazines.
  • IPC was then taken over by Time Warner in 2001, then renamed as Time Inc. UK in 2014.
  • In 2018 Meredith Corporation formed with Time Inc. UK.
  • Time Inc. UK was then taken over by Epiris LLP, then re branded to TI Media in June 2018. 

  • A product is shaped by it's ownership by the owner's ideology being put into the product as well as the regulation.
  • The publisher is a large mainstream organisation, in which it is a part of a media conglomeration.
  • The IPC also produces as well as the 'Woman' magazine, such as, 'World Soccer', 'What's On TV' and 'Cycling Weekly'.
  • This is significant for 'Woman' magazine as TI Media publishes the copies of the magazines.

  • The Time Inc. UK is split into equestrian, cycling, interiors, craft and beauty.
  • Digital audience increased from online websites of the magazines and on social media. The consumption of media is different and is evolving.
  • Time Inc. is a global organisation and is a very intergrated company.